Location: Anjaneya Swamy Temple, Rajiv Ganghi Nagar, Virupakshapura, Bengaluru- 560097
Google maps: https://goo.gl/maps/hL9ghrDeXTWA3JfQ9


Obeisance to Ganadhipathi. Obeisance to Shambhu &c
Be it well. On the date specified, when the maharaya raja-paramehsvara vira-Vijayabhupati Raya maharaya’s son Deva Raya maharaya, on the throne of Vijayanagara, was ruling the kingdom of the world in peace and wisdom:- by the personal order of that Deva-raya- maharaya,-for the offerings and decoration of (the God) Somadeva in the front of the town in Sakasamudra,-the great minister Mangappa Dannanayaka’s son Pratapa-Raya granted a dharma-sasana as follows;- for the offerings and decorations of the God Soma have we granted the Virupakshapura village, whose rental is 20 honnu,- a hamlet of Devasamudra in the Yelahanka-nad, belonging to and under Sivanasamudra granted for our office of Nayaka,- making it Vijayadevarayapura and with that, Devarayapura, land (specified) under the old tank of Devasamudra,- at the time of the eclipse of the sun,- in order that long life, health and increase of wealth may be to Deva-Raya maharaya, and from love to Parameshvara. Details of the rental, of the ceremonies to be performed, and of the seven persons to minister to the God. Usual final verse.
Written by Prataparaya
The inscription is dated 1431 AD. It is about the village of Virupakshapura, in present day Kodigehalli near Hebbal, granted to a Soma deva temple. The practice of grants to temples is going to be the area of analysis.
Villages being granted to temples, is a very frequent observation when one studies inscriptions. However, with special reference to Vijayanagara and other empires as well, donations and gifts to temples can be seen as a political tool, in addition to the belief of rajadharma and reverence to the deity by the ruler. The Vijayanagara empire’s control over the Tamil territories was possible through rich gifts and donations made to the temples, thereby making people less hostile to the foreign rule of Vijayanagara ( called vadugars by the Tamils). In fact, not just the Tamil regions, donations made to temples can be seen as a way of having the public, look up to their rulers, giving them a very good image ; hence validating their authority and, making their control over the territory easier and legitimate. As mentioned in the analysis of the Yelachenahalli inscription, the temple authorities also built tanks, as a form of investment of the donations received, helping the local people. An inscription in Devanahalli dated 1698, gives a detailed description of how the villages gifted to temples were used. Crops grown in the village fields would be used for the service of the God, after deducting the salary of the laborers. Surplus revenue from villages were used for buying ornaments for the deity, after meeting the expenses. Archakas, agama professors, purohitas, reciters of vedas, the repeaters of mantras and thousand names, offerers of flowers and sacrifices, providers of sacred thread and garlands, the parupatyagara and sinabaga, the musicians and dancers, umbrella and palanquin bearers received patronage from the rulers in the form of agraharas for the brahmanas and also villages to palanquin and umbrella bearers (noted in the same inscription Dv-15). As mentioned in the previous sentence, a large number of people were employed for temple management and public work activities initiated by the temple authorities like tank building etc. Also as Noboru Karashima mentioned, the rulers received shares of the offerings to the deities, like foodstuff, clothes as prasadam and honors as the patrons and protectors of the temples, which consolidated their political authority along with the social benefit, which legitimized their position as the ruler. The rulers also received administrative and judicial rights of the temples.
In addition to the mainstream deities, villages also had tutelary deities and lineage or clan shrines belonging to the dominant class of the village. These temples also received benevolent patronage from the Vijayanagara kings. The clan or the lineage shrines of the dominant class, were worshiped by the local ruling chieftain family which claimed to belong to the family of the tutelary deities. According to Burton Stein , the sixteenth and seventeenth century temple chronicles or sthalapurana provided two kinds of myths- one explaining the relationship between the ruling clan and the deity; and the relation between the deity and the mainstream Hindu Gods. Hence the Vijayanagara rulers, having included the local deities into the their religious pantheon, not only made their rule less hostile, but also elevated the position of the local chieftains by claiming their connection to the deity, leading to a sort of political integration. The phrase, ‘granted for our office of naayaka’ in the inscription refers to the naayakara system, discussed in the analysis of Yelachenahalli inscription.
The inscription was found in the Anjaneya Temple in Kodigehalli. The temple priest gave an interesting piece of information; the video has been uploaded on instagram. As mentioned in the post, most of the information given by the priest is either incorrect or unverified. However, he said that the idol was installed by Vyasatirtha, during the reign of Krishnadevaraya. We have no evidence to prove this, however the possibility may not be denied as Vyasatirtha from the Madhwa math was the preceptor or spiritual adviser to Krishnadevaraya. This throws light into another important feature of this era; the patronage received by the monasteries or mathas. The role played by these mathas and especially the Madhwa math under Vyasatirtha in Vijayanagara has been explained in detail by Valerie Stoker in his book Polemics and Patronage in the City of Victory.
Arjun Appadurai also vividly explains the role played by these mathas in the political conquest of the Tamil country. The transaction between the Vijayanagara rulers and the temples in Tamil Nadu occurred as a result of the intermediary activities of the mathas, thus consolidating not just the authority of the sovereign, but their position in the society as well.
Coming back to the installation of idols, Stoker mentions in his book, how Vyasatirtha, with the wealth he received, went around the empire installing icons and subsidiary shrines. Considering that, we may accept that this idol may have been installed by Vyasatirtha but we do not have any evidence to prove this.
REFERENCES
- Stoker, V. (2016). Hindu Sectarianism and the City of Victory. In Polemics and Patronage in the City of Victory: Vyasatirtha, Hindu Sectarianism, and the Sixteenth-Century Vijayanagara Court (pp. 1-16). Oakland, California: University of California Press. Retrieved April 7, 2020, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1kc6jt3.7
- Carla M. Sinopoli, & Kathleen D. Morrison. (1995). Dimensions of Imperial Control the Vijayanagara Capital. American Anthropologist, 97(1), new series, 83-96. Retrieved April 7, 2020, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/682381
- Stein, B. (1990). The New Cambridge History of India. doi: 10.1017/chol9780521266932
- Epigraphia Carnatica, Volume-9



